News from

 

 Text of messages received from Iranian-American organizations regarding anti-sanctions lobbying


Press release from the Iranian American Jewish Federation

Marzepourgohar statement

 

 ******* PRESS RELEASE ******* PRESS RELEASE *******PRESS RELEASE *******PRESS RELEASE *******
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
      ******* PRESS RELEASE ******* PRESS RELEASE *******PRESS RELEASE *******PRESS RELEASE *******
 
Los Angeles
April 25, 2005
 
THE IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION
VOICES ITS STRONG SUPPORT FOR CONGRESS' INITIATIVES
HR 282 AND S 333
 
 The Iranian American Jewish Federation (IAJF), today voiced its strong support for HR 282 authored by Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, and S 333 authored by Senator Rick Santorum.
 
 "We have recently witnessed a statement issued by a small group which appears to be sympathetic to at least some elements of the Islamic Republic's foreign policy goals, falsely implying that the Iranian American community opposes these initiatives by an overwhelming majority" said Elias Eshaghian, Chairman of the Board of the IAJF.
 
 "Accordingly, the IAJF felt that it was necessary to make it clear that not only does NIAC [National Iranian American Council] not represent the views of our community, but that indeed the IAJF strongly supports both of these initiatives and deeply appreciates the support of their authors and co-signers in the U.S. Congress."
 
 Mr. Eshaghian added that:  "The policy of the IAJF is rooted in support for the wishes of the majority of the Iranian people. In this respect we are in full agreement with the President's policy of standing with the People of Iran and we support all initiatives that would be conducive to free expression of opinion by those people."
 

    ******* PRESS RELEASE ******* PRESS RELEASE *******PRESS RELEASE *******PRESS RELEASE *******
 

Contact: Sam Kermanian
  Secretary General
  Iranian American Jewish Federation
(323) 654-4700


Iranians strongly reject normalized relations between the US and the Islamic Republic

 

April 22, 2005

On February 4th, 2005, the State Department again reiterated that the United

States government does not have a policy of regime change in occupied Iran. One

can hardly be shocked; the State Department is the very same American government

institution that granted Mohsen Sazegara, the founder of the Islamic Republic‚s

Revolutionary Guard, a visa to visit the United States.

 

While a small minority have voiced their concern regarding the American

government‚s possible adoption of peaceful overthrow of the theocracy, very few

are speaking out about the real danger, namely what devastating impact

normalization of ties between the Islamic Republic and United States would have

on occupied Iran, American credibility and regional stability.

 

Many Iranians living around the world recognize what a great threat restored

relations between the theocracy and the United States poses. Point in fact: a

sample of 500 Iranians in the United States found that 485 or 97% oppose the idea

of restored relations.

 

The American president has declared that the stated policy of the United States

government is to promote democracy around the world, specifically in the Middle

East. Though the State Department may not fathom it, the fact is that the

establishment of democracy in Iran translates to the overthrow of the theocracy.

Simply put: if you support democracy in Iran, you support regime change.

 

Normalization of ties between the occupying clerical regime and America is

tantamount to the same policy that led to the overthrow of Iran‚s national hero,

Dr. Mossadegh, and saw him replaced with the monarchy in 1953. The people‚s

revolution of 1978, prior to being hijacked by clerics, saw Iranians revolt

against a government that was utterly loathed, yet supported by the United States

government. Iranians now have favorable views towards the United States since it

has stood firm against the theocracy. Does the US want to see a repeat of 1978 by

supporting another regime Iranians hate?

 

The Islamic Republic and it‚s lobbyists in the United States would like the world

to believe that restored relations will be beneficial to Iranians. They falsely

argue that increased trade will benefit Iranians, and that the democratic

movement will be able to progress in a more rapid fashion. This ridiculous

argument can be readily defeated by simply looking at what effects normalization

has had between Europe and the Islamic Republic. While trade between the clerics

and the EU continues to increase, repression and economic hardships have also

progressively gotten much worse. The Iranian middleclass has been decimated to a

point where one is either somehow connected with the ruling clergy and enjoys a

comfortable living, or be like the other ninety percent of Iranians that work two

or three jobs just to make ends meet. The Islamic Republic no longer has to mask

its aggression against Iranians, having a cheerleader by the name of the EU ready

to prevent any negative impact on the theocracy.

 

 

Peaceful means to weaken the theocracy, such as sanctions, simply cannot work

effectively when practically every country is doing business with the clerics.

The world needs to realize that an independent, secular republican Iran is the

best way to ensure peace and regional stability. Moreover, if the international

community seeks to preserve their respective national interest then they must

take concrete steeps to support Iranian aspiration for freedom.

 

Long Live Iran

 

Compiled by the Foreign Policy Council of the Marze Por Gohar Party

http://www.marzeporgohar.org/index.php?l=1&cat=17&scat=31&artid=560